Historical Poker Archive | Announcement: March 14, 2011

Full Tilt Poker announced plans for the Onyx Cup in March 2011, presenting the proposed series as an international, high-stakes tournament circuit. Contemporary reporting described buy-ins ranging from $100,000 to $300,000 and an estimated combined prize pool of $30 million.

An Ambitious Tournament Proposal

The plan called for five preliminary events and a concluding Grand Finale with a $250,000 buy-in and a proposed $1 million addition to the prize pool. Participants were to earn leaderboard points based on their finishes, with a series champion recognized after the finale.

The launch announcement featured prominent poker players including Phil Ivey, Patrik Antonius, Gus Hansen, Erik Seidel and Tom Dwan. Coverage at the time described proposed events in the United States, Europe and Asia.

Plans Versus Completed Events

The figures and schedule above describe what was announced in March 2011, not a claim that every proposed tournament was subsequently held. This distinction matters when reconstructing historical news about a planned competition.

Archive note: Independently written summary of a historical announcement, not the original 2011 article or an endorsement of any gaming operator.

Historical reference: PokerNews — Full Tilt Poker Announces Onyx Cup, March 14, 2011.

The Proposal Behind the Onyx Cup

In March 2011, Full Tilt Poker publicized plans for a high-stakes tournament series called the Onyx Cup. The announcement proposed buy-ins from $100,000 to $300,000 and an estimated combined prize pool of $30 million. Those figures placed the concept at the expensive end of tournament poker, where a single entry would cost more than many players’ entire annual tournament budgets.

The proposed structure included five preliminary events followed by a Grand Finale. Contemporary reporting described a $250,000 buy-in for the concluding event and an additional $1 million contribution to its prize pool. The organizers also described a points-based leaderboard intended to identify an overall series champion.

A Circuit Rather Than a Single Event

One distinctive aspect of the proposal was its ambition to link high-buy-in tournaments across multiple locations. The announcement discussed events in the United States, Europe and Asia. That international framing was important: the idea was not merely to stage one expensive tournament, but to present a season of related competitions with a recognizable identity.

The leaderboard concept supported that goal. Rather than defining success only through the winner of a single event, the proposed points system would reward performances across the series. It suggested an attempt to make elite high-stakes poker into an ongoing competition with its own standings and culminating event.

The Players Associated With the Launch

Coverage of the announcement featured well-known names including Phil Ivey, Patrik Antonius, Gus Hansen, Erik Seidel and Tom Dwan. Their inclusion reflected the kind of audience and competitive field the proposed series sought to attract. It should not be read as proof that each player later entered every planned event.

That distinction is particularly relevant for promotional announcements. A launch presentation can name prospective participants, destinations and prizes without establishing that the announced schedule was subsequently completed as described.

What the 2011 Announcement Actually Establishes

The historical fact preserved by this headline is that Full Tilt Poker announced the Onyx Cup proposal in March 2011. The planned buy-ins, projected prize pool, event format and proposed international scope were all part of that announcement. They are not, by themselves, verified results from tournaments that took place later.

This entry therefore treats the Onyx Cup as a story about the ambitions of high-stakes poker at the time, not as a completed championship record. Readers looking for confirmed winners or final payouts would need separate event results. The contemporary PokerNews report cited above documents what was announced, while this reconstruction explains its significance without converting plans into outcomes.